Restoring Humanity to Leadership

Aug 12, 2021 7 Min Read
two clutched hands
Source:Photo by Aarón Blanco Tejedor
“World belongs to humanity, not this leader, that leader or that king or prince or religious leader. World belongs to humanity.” – Dalai Lama.
There is no value in asking yourself “Am I a leader?” Instead, ask “Who am I leading? And where am I going?”

With recovery underway in many advanced economies, money is surging back into leadership development after the down-years of the recession. In 2013, companies spent an estimated worldwide total of US$45.5 billion on education for leaders at all levels. But a raft of recent statistics show that these whopping investments are failing to move the needle where it matters most — from employee engagement to public trust. Even as they keep the billions pouring in, a majority of executives claim to have lost faith in leadership development altogether.

This situation brings two questions to mind: Exactly what accounts for the disappointment in leadership development programmes? And if they really do not work, why do companies keep buying, and buying into, them? In a recent paper “Can Business Schools Humanize Leadership?”, Gianpiero and Jennifer Petriglieri, professors of Organisational Behaviour at INSEAD, argue that it is precisely the most inadequate features of these programmes that prove irresistible to companies, executives and educators alike.

The Petriglieris argue that what they term “the leadership industrial complex” largely peddles a decontextualised, depersonalised view of leadership that has little relation with what leading looks and feels like in the real world. Clients, for their part, embrace the lofty but empty rhetoric of leadership skills and tools as a convenient distraction from the difficult conflicts leaders must navigate on a daily basis. Though the authors offer no easy, straightforward solutions — and in fact argue against such simple prescriptions — they do point the way to a more generative way of thinking about and developing leadership.

“You could call us optimistic critics, or sceptical optimists,” Gianpiero says.

This may interest you: Leadership Lessons From The Original Santa Claus

The Anxiety of Influence

The Petriglieris argue for a return to the concept of leadership that reigned back before training leaders became big business. “If you go back to the foundational writing on leadership,” Jennifer says, “leadership was always contextualized, portrayed as an effort made on behalf of a group. If you weren’t representing us, you weren’t a leader.”

Somewhere along the line, however, the dominant leadership paradigm got twisted into one that places much more emphasis on influencing groups than representing them. “It’s a sugarcoated definition of coercion,” avers Jennifer. But most leaders seem to buy into this view despite its flaws. Reducing leadership into influence is soothing, because it suggests that leadership can be earned simply by mastering a set of Svengali-like tools or skills that will work on anyone, anytime, anywhere.

This may interest you: How To Use Anxiety As A Decision Making Tool

The Anxiety of Performance

Of late, some leadership development programmes have sought to counter this view with the opposite extreme: a focus on personal expression. Equally detached from context, the pursuit of what the Petriglieris call “selfless self-absorption” often becomes an opportunity to indulge in a narcissistic preoccupation with one’s preferences and goals.

While the influence-based approach turns leadership into a means to achieve some financial or otherwise material performance goals, the expression-based approach turns it into a means to accomplish the performance of one’s values and style. In the real world, however, leaders can’t choose one or the other. 

“There is more than one kind of performance a leader needs to be concerned with, and he or she cannot just pick one,” Gianpiero says. “When we talk about a leader’s performance, we look at a leader’s financial results, and we look at how he or she embodies, or not, a certain culture. If you are not doing both, you are not really leading.”

The Purpose of “Purpose”

As an example, Gianpiero cites the rise of “purpose” as a buzzword in leadership circles. “It’s become psychologised to mean some kind of personal sense of satisfaction. But purpose isn’t a feeling.” The authentic quest for purpose lies in asking the tough, truth-seeking questions that the psychologised sense of “purpose” elides.

Questions like: "Why am I doing this? For whom? What are the consequences?” says Gianpiero.

Effective leadership performance hinges on the willingness to ask fundamental questions, absorb the answers, and act on them — which can’t be done if you’re fixated on just one side of the influence-expression binary.

Read more:

Back to Humanity

The Petriglieris have devised novel methodologies for restoring humanity and reality to business education. Jennifer teaches the Psychological Issues in Management course at INSEAD, one of the school’s most popular MBA electives. The class invites students to examine their personal histories and aspirations in light of their career goals, and vice versa, within a group that resembles what they will encounter in the workplace.

Doing leadership development this way, the Petriglieris argue, is not for the faint of heart. “Leadership never is, whether it happens in a classroom or in a company,” says Jennifer. “Instructors who want to use these methods cannot take refuge in the status of ‘expert’. They need to have the courage to struggle with the same questions as their students.”

Gianpiero attributes the course’s popularity to a shift in priorities evident in the next generation of leaders: “Managers are not coming to business schools just to make a living. They’re coming to make a life.”

Companies will need new forms of leadership development for younger execs coming down the talent pipeline. As one way forward, Gianpiero and Jennifer cite the Executive Leadership Journey, which was custom-designed for a global company newly formed out of the merger of two parent companies. Alongside the usual focus on acquiring new knowledge and practicing new skills, the eight-day course places heavy emphasis on clarifying and deepening participants’ understanding of leadership and followership, at both an individual and a group level.

Here too, instructors are honest and open about their own ongoing development, instead of presenting themselves as the “finished product” of a leadership assembly line. “What makes a good leader,” says Gianpiero “is what makes a good instructor too. Their work is evidence-based and question-focused. They use knowledge as a starting point for exploring new, important questions, rather than as a definitive truth to just pass on.”

This is why the Petriglieris argue that leadership development should help managers become not just more knowledgeable, but also more curious; not only more assured of their abilities, but also more aware of their own need to continue growing.

For all their objections to the way leadership development is normally practiced, the Petriglieris remain passionate believers in its transformative potential. “A programme shouldn’t just make you feel confident and inspired, it should also make you feel troubled in a constructive way,” says Jennifer.

Read more: 5 Lessons On Embracing Humanity In Business

Be sure to check out this podcast unpacking the Truth and Humanity in Leadership!

P.S. Speaking of Humanity, turn your attention to the product below! (Fun fact: it might be beneficial for your organisation)


Happily (or Budaya for those from Indonesia) is an amazing engagement app built for organisation to drive engagement amongst employees. It has amazing analytics and also provides activities for employees to be fully immersed in the organisation's culture and values. To find out more, click here or email

This article is republished courtesy of INSEAD Knowldege. Copyright INSEAD 2021

Share This


  1. Spending on Corporate Training Soars: Employee Capabilities Now A Priority - An article by Josh Bersin
  2. The Fix for Your Failing Leadership Development Program - An article by The i4cp Team
  3. Can Business Schools Humanise Leadership? - A research article by Gianpiero Petriglieri and Jennifer Petriglieri
  4. Elective Courses - MBA Programme
  5. Truth and Humanity in Leadership - A podcast by Lars Dalgaard interviewed by Bethany Coates
Benjamin Kessler is Managing Editor of INSEAD Knowledge.

You May Also Like

Leaders climbing the leadership ladder

11 Leadership Skills To Build In 2024 For Executives And Emerging Leaders

By William Arruda. Unveil the essential skills for modern leadership in 2024. From emotional intelligence to digital literacy, discover the competencies that define successful leaders in a transformed work landscape. These skills, blending traditional and soft skills, form the bedrock for leaders to navigate complexities, foster inclusivity, and drive innovation in today's dynamic environment.

Jan 04, 2024 3 Min Read


Raise Your Game: Micromanaging Matters

As we move into an age where freedom and flexibility become a necessity at work, the idea of micromanaging has slowly become synonymous with rigidity and a distinct lack of creativity. For some, it is even regarded as a dirty word. Joseph Tan from Leaderonomics Good Monday explores this area and shares his thoughts on micromanaging.

Apr 25, 2016 16 Min Podcast


Increasing Your Return on Luck (ROL)

Is luck just a roll of the dice, or can you create your own? Dive into the transformative power of a positive attitude, humility, and curiosity in shaping your luck. Based on Roshan Thiran's article, this video explores how to increase your Return on Luck (ROL) and seize new opportunities.

Oct 27, 2023 4 Min Video

Be a Leader's Digest Reader