Set your sights on the finish line
Traction is a recent buzzword that I thought I left behind in my days of working with start-ups and business planning. In my case, it was often used within the context of funding where infusion is sometimes done in tranches.
Where a sum of money is allotted for the capitalisation of a business, a business plan would first have to prove “traction” within a critical period of time to ensure that the business was actually making progress and therefore had some semblance of sustainability.
In some cases the term is also used when a business has passed the start-up phase and has entered the growth phase – evidence of progress are referred to as traction.
Metrics or indicators that prove business progress such as revenue growth, market share, brand awareness and efficiencies could all be considered summarily as traction. There is no prescribed way of defining it. Traction could be used under broad contexts under different applications.
The easiest way to define traction is to bring the term back into its simplest form. When you ride a bicycle just as I do, “traction” is the measurable force that directs power to the ground and in turn propels me towards a forward momentum within a given direction.
Without traction or grip, the bike cannot go in a chosen direction, will lose its momentum and fail to reach its destination.
The same could be said in the business of life. Output will always be the ultimate measure of effectiveness, and effectiveness is defined by your capacity to reach your goals. Simply put, going back to the analogy of the bike, “traction” indicates whether or not you are actually getting anywhere in life and business.
To understand the importance of traction, it is best to retrace the steps using the framework that is broadly described within the orders of: Input–Process–Output.
At the end of this equation is a singular “Output or Outcome” which is a summary of a desired result. Taking it another step back within the realm of “Process” are subsets of objectives that are results of activities that need to be accomplished.
Within this area of process and objectives are measurements of progress that are referred to as “traction”.
Taking a further step back is the realm of “Inputs” where resources are used to start the process. Here is a real life example to make things easier.
I am currently coaching a business led by a driven CEO named David who had his goal set on finishing an Ironman (a triathlon event) in Melbourne last March 23, 2014.
While the goal of finishing a strong Ironman event may sound overly simplistic, seeing it through a framework of Input–Process–Output puts the matter under a deeper perspective.
The key here is having an end in mind but also the knowledge of breaking down your goal into smaller objectives, activities, smaller tasks, and material inputs.
The G.O.A.T framework
I usually teach a framework that a mentor also taught me when I was working for the International Labour Organisation. It is called G.O.A.T, which stands for Goals, Objectives, Activities and Tasks. It helps you break down a goal into smaller manageable chunks.
In this case the goal was to finish a full Ironman under 17 hours. The goal broken down into a set of three sub-objectives would be to finish the 3.86km swim within two hours and 20 minutes, a 180.25km bike ride within eight hours and 10 minutes and a 42.2km run within six hours and 30 minutes.
Goals and objectives
“Goals” and “Objectives” are considered outputs, and tracing things back, objectives are driven by processes and activities that are measureable.
While David was racing in Melbourne, his friends were giving a minute-by-minute report online. David finished the first event, the swim leg within 1:13:09 and the bike leg within 5:18:09. With two out of three legs completed with measurable speeds way below the cut-offs, we are almost sure of a very strong finish. This is what we refer to as “traction”.
Traction is a measurement of progress and a key performance indicator (KPI) that signifies you will accomplish your goal or mission. In the end, David finished the race strong with a few seconds above 11 hours. That was six hours below the cut-off.
You cannot get these types of outputs and traction overnight. The hours saved per leg are a composite of how much time was invested in training. The effects are in direct proportion to the amount of hours spent in the pool, on the bike, and in your running shoes.
The point is that time and traction are directly correlated. The amount of measureable performance that indicates traction is directly proportional to the amount of time invested in training.
This is the very reason why I love working with athletes. They know that strategic goals and objectives cannot be achieved without an investment of time and resource.
There are prerequisite inputs and “Tasks” such as taking proper nutrition, managing your schedules, getting the equipment and preparing mentally. You also need to have the base fitness before getting into a rigorous training programme.
The same could be said with any goal. You must understand the commitment, time and resource involved before reaching them, and yes, all of these processes will take time. It takes about two hours for me to write an article such as this even before it gets to the editing phase for later publishing.
Perhaps you’re looking at “running a marathon” to knock it off your bucket list. If you haven’t done a “half-mary” or worse, haven’t started running yet, and then perhaps you should start walking today? Perhaps you need to get a pair of running shoes first?
Develop the Input–Process–Output mindset and after you’ve made up your mind, you can follow it through with the G.O.A.T framework for planning.
While this may seem all personal and not much to do about business, then take another look. David runs a company that distributes some of the best brands known to endurance athletes such as Pinarello, Cervelo and Felt Bicycles. He also distributes soft goods such as 2XU, Zoot, and Aquasphere goggles along with race nutrition and other performance gear.
Being a competitive Ironman is actually very strategic for him. It gives him the personal brand profile advantage that he could use for his suppliers and customers. It pays dividends both in his personal brand equity and the company he runs.
The passion and personal commitment that he attaches to his sport and his business gives him enormous credibility with the people he works with, as well as the brands that he endorses. In my experience working with him, I could truly say that he’s getting a lot of strategic traction but also because he makes time.
John Walter Baybay is a regional management consultant who has worked for more than 17 years in corporate strategic planning and economic planning. He is a competitive athlete who balances his time between business coaching, family and working with communities. To read more articles from leaderonomers, click here.